Time for a Little Teamwork?
Mon 25th August, 2008

By Graham Fleet

The IOC tries to foster working relationships between sponsors both contractually and informally. There are Panasonic wide screens in every sponsor venue and it is as if Pepsi does not exist. However, the competition between the sponsors is tangible and adds a little frisson of atmosphere to Olympic Green. The number of visitors into each individual sponsor showcase pavilion is a matter of great conjecture, and admiration for other marketing efforts can at times be grudgingly given.



It is natural of course. You are on top of each other in such a highly pressurise and performance laden area. And with such huge amounts of money involved people look within the Olympic family for benchmarks.

However, on wandering around the Green you wonder whether more can be done together. Why do guests of Coca-Cola have to be kept apart from guests of adidas all the time? Should the sponsors have a centralised ticket exchange so that sponsors can try to satisfy every individual request to get out to the sport they want? Should they collectively promote their activities rather than having separate promotional teams and materials.

May be I should be more of a realist but perhaps a little less competition and a little more co-operation will pay off in the long run.

Is this a global marketing event?
Sun 24th August, 2008

By Graham Fleet

Because of the commercial structure of the Games – the only companies with the rights to market their association globally are the TOPs i.e. Visa, Coke, McDonalds etc. Sign with the IOC and you have the rights to be associated with over 200 national teams competing in the Games. Imagine what that would cost in football – get the World Cup and get Brazil, Italy, Spain, Japan and England thrown in for good measure.



Well I would be intriqued to know how many markets the likes of Coke, McDonalds and Visa have activated in. A colleague was in Brazil last week and he saw little evidence, the Coke activity in the UK felt professional rather than passionate and in Jamaica presumably no sponsor is quick enough to keep up.

Great sporting events need great marketing partners. They build the anticipation, add to the fun and add to the scale. Global organisations have budgetary and organisational challenges in pulling off multi-national campaigns but let’s hope they can do so because the more the Games values are communicated (and the sponsors are traditionally very good at supporting the performance, humanity and integrity of the Games) the stronger the Olympic brand will become and the more long term value the sponsors will receive.


No Surprise…The Same Rules of Fair Play Do Not Necessarily Apply to All
Fri 22nd August, 2008

By Kristina Schaefer

Partial information is a dangerous thing…as are assumptions based solely on history. This is a rule for life, as well as for Olympic Marketers. While I am personally a big believer of knowing one’s history (so as not to repeat it…AND so as to enable one to move forward with activation that should be allowed based on precedent), I am an even stronger believer in constant learning and real-time trends monitoring.

Take for example several UK media reports last week regarding Nike being granted waivers to utilize Beijing Olympians in UK activation activities, despite adidas’ official relationship with the British Olympic Association and the London 2012 Olympic Games. At first glance, this appears to be an appalling grant of rights to the detriment of a dedicated sponsor of British sport; a company that has paid millions in official rights to National Olympic Teams around the world. However things are not always as they seem. Fact is, the International Olympic Committee, in its work with the World Federation of Sporting Goods Industries (WSFGI), grants ALL sporting goods manufacturers waivers to Rule 41 of the IOC Charter (the rule that restricts the use of competing Olympians’ name/likeness commercially during the Gamestime period). Why do all sporting goods manufacturers receive this benefit, and other non-sporting-goods sponsors do not? Because unlike other sponsors, sporting goods manufacturers integrally support athletes and sports federations 365 days/year in Olympic and non-Olympic years…with equipment, training, research and development. Without their collective support, many grassroots sports programs would never develop or survive. Because of this, it would not be fair to these companies to restrict their ability to utilize the athletes they support just because it’s Gamestime. And all (official sportswear sponsors and non-official sportswear companies alike), have to comply with certain “play fair” guidelines during the Games. No one can make performance claims, and only congratulatory messages are to be sent through marketing channels.



So while it seems grossly unfair, the solution struck in recent years works. Playing fair across the board means that Nike is able to receive a Rule 41 waiver in the UK where adidas is a BOA sponsor, and that adidas is equally able to receive a Rule 41 waiver in Japan where Mizuno is a sponsor, and in Jamaica where Puma is a sponsor. Good, right? Well…not to confuse things (because of course, they already are confusing), but seven countries are actually able to “opt out” of this universal Rule 41 grant of rights…including the United States. So while adidas has to sit back and watch Nike market against athletes during Gamestime in the UK, Australia, and Germany (all adidas sponsored teams), the USOC prohibits adidas the same benefit against Nike in the United States. The same fairness rules for all? You decide.


Does Performance Make or Break a Brand Ambassador?
Thursday 21st July, 2008

By Seth Holmes

Over the weekend I received an email from the Nike team, solicited by me through a year of marathon training with Nike + ipod, and urging me to get behind Nike sponsored athlete Paula Radcliffe as she attempted the Olympic marathon. The email proudly proclaimed her a strong medal prospect, and then announced her part in October’s Nike 10k Human Race. Opening this on Monday was an unfortunate episode after the weekend’s results, and no doubt plays to the common perception that athlete endorsement is risky. So from a brand’s perspective does her performance make or break the relationship?

A moment of sympathy for Paula; she certainly polarises our opinion in both directions, but deserves our utmost admiration for her efforts, despite not making the podium. And herein is the key. She’s earned our loyalty. We’ve invested our emotions and will continue to support her. She has the qualities we respect and idolise in the Olympian spirit.



Nike will be as proud of her as a figurehead for the 10K. Paula has helped the brand re-position itself to core runners, and it’s unlikely that she would ever sell product in the way a Nadal or LeBron do, thereby the effect of her result on sales would be negligible. Nike does an incredible job in bringing athletes into our collective consciousness and like a marriage, the power of the best endorsements rest in the personality as much as performance. It’s about crafting your message through the lens of that personality, and Paula embodies ‘just do it’ Olympic medal or not.

The case of Paula should be looked at in the context of an injury to the even more high profile Liu Xiang. His Sponsors (Coke, Lenovo, Nike) will argue they had four great years of exposure running up to and during the Games, and benefited hugely from him being the ‘face’ of the Chinese team. So much of Olympic marketing is tailored to the build up, savouring and anticipating success that arguably they have already achieved what they set out to. Xiang is only two home grown icons (with Yao Ming), so it’s likely that his withdrawal was more detrimental for brand China than the sponsors that can still deal effectively with his and Chinese peoples’ disappointment. Liu Xiang’s loss will be another’s gain, and China now has some forty or more success stories to choose from.



No International athlete will emerge with such credit from Beijing as Michael Phelps whose sponsors (AT&T, VISA, Omega, Speedo) will have benefited hugely by the coverage his record eight gold medals have brought in the worldwide media. How to effectively leverage this exposure will be foremost on their minds as the games wind up. The window for marketing Olympians is essentially short – unless you are a hardened swim fan, can you honestly tell me when and where Phelps or his fellow swimmers will be in the pool before 2012? Sponsors have a chance to celebrate his success and Phelps himself has the opportunity to catapult himself into the realms of great – rising above the profile of the Olympic pool. This is an opportunity only few have and his trip to London is no doubt the first step to becoming a global sporting icon and capitalise on the limited window the Games itself provides.



As China takes stock of what its achieved, Team GB will return to a hero’s welcome. Many of its stars such as Chris Hoy (Adidas, B&Q, BT) and Ben Ainslie (JP Morgan Asset Management, BT, Corum) are established athletes with a roster of brand supporters, but the Olympic Games is unique in its ability to throw new stars from obscurity and the likes of Rebecca Adlington (double Olympic swimming gold) will be inundated with offers, in the hope she is adulated and promoted by her country in a similar way to Liu Xiang. Done well, there’s nothing as powerful as a personal endorsement.

To those brands looking to recruit themselves an Olympian, here are five rules of engagement as you seek out and initiate your perfect partnership:

1.Create before you negotiate – Work out how and where you will need your ambassador before negotiating these rights in your contract

2.Plan for every eventuality – Don’t let marketing success be solely defined by athlete achievement

3.Extend the window – The Olympic Games happens on a four year cycle so developing a strong series of events and stories in between is key

4.Identify the personality, as well as the performance – aligning your brand to a similar personality will create the right fit

5.Be ready for anything – Retain budget to celebrate either success or heroic failure; in the worst case scenario be prepared to take a definitive line on an issue.

The Johnson and Johnson Explorers Programme
Weds 20th August, 2008

By Janet Lewis

In back to back 5 day periods, I had the pleasure of hosting a Johnson & Johnson team from the UK and then from Canada with the purpose of taking them "behind the scenes" of the Olympic Games! Both teams were selected by their respective teams and identified as potential leaders should J&J renew the sponsorship for the following quadrennium.

Their trips included meetings with Johnson & Johnson internal groups such as the hospitality team, operations, medical and the J&J China team. We spent considerable time at the Johnson & Johnson Olympic Games pavilion (and were fortunate to have crystal clear blue skies to take in the view of the Olympic Green), the main consumer activation program for the public. But we also visited with other sponsors (GE, Visa, Adidas) to learn about their history, their goals for the Games, key learnings, etc. I think the teams really benefited from these meetings - how did others deal with challenges, how did they measure success, what are they looking forward to for Vancouver and London? They had time to personally interact with these other sponsors and begin to also build key relationships with them for the future.



We toured the Main Press Center (MPC) where the accredited print media "live" for the duration of the Games. It has it's own dry cleaner, med center, pharmacy, Mcdonalds, cafeteria, etc. We also had an engaging visit to the athlete village, and specifically the polyclinic for where the athletes, coaches, etc go for any health issues. For some, this is the only time in their life they will ever have an eye test or dental exam - all with support from J&J. The village, as you can imagine, is extremely restricted. They have 2 zones - an international zone and residential…the latter being even tougher to get in. So the team was just so enthralled walking around where the athlete stay. And it is impressive! They have tennis courts, a pool, a hair/nail salon, a post office, their own store, several cafeterias, a jogging trail, an entertainment center, etc.



Of course, in addition to the hard work we all put in, the Explorers had a lot of fun. We saw beach volleyball, gymnastics, athletics, diving, water polo and a few other events over the course of the 2 trips.

The planning and coordination of these programs was challenging and at times quite intense, but overall, but teams seemed to really learn a lot and that was the goal. Should J&J renew these trips will be more than worthwhile, but even if they decline, these trips were a strong source of pride and corporate involvement for those lucky enough to participate.